As discussed in this post, the Ocean Renewable Energy Coalition has filed testimony in support of a Production Tax Credit (PTC) for ocean, wave and current technologies. We've also been working with contacts in the Senate to draft language for the PTC that's broad enough to capture a wide range of wave, tidal, thermal and current technology with applications in oceans and non-impounded, free flowing lakes and rivers.
But making the case for the PTC has required more than simply filing testimony and making persuasive policy arguments. With legislation like a PTC, which will impact the amount of revenues collected by the federal government, Congress is required to quantify the potential budgetary impacts. Naturally, smaller impacts will increase the likelihood of a measure passing. So here, we called upon Roger Bedard, the Project Manager of EPRI's Ocean Program to run some numbers for us. You can view the EPRI analysis here. (Word document). The analysis bears out that the budgetary impacts of a PTC are minimal given that only a small amount of ocean generation will come on line in the next five years. Because impacts are small, it's our view that Congress has nothing to lose - and everything to gain - by extending the PTC to ocean.
When a fellow says, "It ain't the money but the principle of the thing,"
it's the money.
-- Kim Hubbard
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://candaceherringzc.easyjournal.com
Posted by: abrabWare | May 07, 2008 at 09:21 AM
I'm new here, just wanted to say hello and introduce myself.
Posted by: EncuriLic | August 17, 2008 at 03:59 PM